If you have any doubts as to why countries should not repatriate ISIS brides and their children just ask Sky News correspondent Mark Stone about the encounter he had with a small boy who is the son of an ISIS bride in a Syrian detention center for ISIS brides.
The boy told Stone, ‘We’re going to kill you by slaughtering you. We will slaughter you.’”
Prior to stating that the boy quoted this from the Koran:
‘God says, “Turn to Allah with sincere repentance in the hope that your Lord will remove you from your ills”.’”
The kid may not be a threat today, but tomorrow when he is old enough to manufacture pipe bombs or drive a truck through a heavily populated sidewalk or even take a knife and go on a stabbing rampage.
Liberals insist that these women and their children be repatriated to the countries they come from.
Is that because they are willing to do the jobs that citizens refuse to do like stage a terror attack? Countries must be free to decide for themselves if they are willing to take in these women and their radicalized children.
"We're going to kill you by slaughtering you. We will slaughter you."@Stone_SkyNews reports from Syrian Al Hol camp which is home to 70,000 IS women and children. 10,000 of them are foreigners.
Read the full report here: https://t.co/DcfGTxWy9C pic.twitter.com/0lSmssFTgl
— Sky News (@SkyNews) November 11, 2019
Some who spoke to Stone defended the caliphate’s atrocities, such as beheading prisoners and burning people alive, on grounds that “It’s says it in the Koran” [sic].
As the Islamic State’s last territorial strongholds were being evacuated, it was reported that some evacuated jihadi brides made openly statements, such as “My son will grow up to be a jihadist” and “I hope the Islamic caliphate will return and spread across all corners of the globe,” among other ominous declarations.
The position of left-liberals on these women is fairly indulgent. All contend that they cannot be stripped off their citizenship, despite having defected to a hostile power overseas, unless they are dual nationals with citizenship or eligibility for citizenship elsewhere — and some argue they should not be stripped of their citizenship at all.
