VIA America’s Freedom Fighters: York County Man Charged With Producing, Receiving And Possession Of Child Pornography And Enticing A Minor To Engage In Sexual Conduct
HARRISBURG – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that on August 4, 2021, Jeremy Fallbeck, age 31, of York, Pennsylvania, was charged with producing, receiving, and coercing child pornography and enticing a child to engage in unlawful sexual activity.
According to Acting U.S. Attorney Bruce D. Brandler, the indictment charges Fallbeck with producing and attempting to produce child pornography, receiving child pornography, possessing child pornography, and coercing or enticing a child to engage in unlawful sexual activity from on or about January 9, 2019 until on or about August 25, 2019, in York County.
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc For more information about internet safety education, please visit www.usdoj.gov/psc and click on the tab “resources.”
Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law for these offenses is up to life imprisonment, a term of up to lifetime supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant’s educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law for these offenses is up to life imprisonment, a term of up to lifetime supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant’s educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
SOURCE – DOJ
WE WANT TO THANK THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE DEDICATED THEIR LIVES TO PROTECTING OUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN FROM THESE EVIL CHILD PREDATORS.
NAZIBOOK AND TWITTER PERMANENTLY KICKED US OF THEIR FILTHY PLATFORMS BECAUSE WE PUBLISHED STORIES ON THE CHINA VIRUS AND THE RIGGED ELECTION MONTHS BEFORE THE FACTS CAME OUT THAT WE WERE ACTUALLY 100% CORRECT.
