Maria Shriver is your typical liberal which basically means she does not allow the truth to disturb her ideology. You would think that anyone with half a brain would look at the videos and clearly see that Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self-defense. O course you would be sadly mistaken if you believe a liberal has half a brain.
Take for an instance that liberals claim Rittenhouse is a white supremacist because he shot three people How stupid would you have to be to say something that not even Forrest Gump could come up with. Shriver says she is befuddled on how the jury could find Kyle innocent.
Shriver — who was a Peabody and Emmy award-winning journalist for NBC News — wrote on Twitter:
“I’m trying to take a beat to digest the Rittenhouse verdict. My son just asked me how it’s possible that he didn’t get charged for anything. How is that possible? I don’t have an answer for him.”
“The idea that someone could be out with a semi-automatic weapon, kill people, and walk is stunning. I look forward to hearing from the jury. This is a moment for them to explain how they came to their decision.”
I’m trying to take a beat to digest the Rittenhouse verdict. My son just asked me how it’s possible that he didn’t get charged for anything. How is that possible? I don’t have an answer for him.
— Maria Shriver (@mariashriver) November 20, 2021
Shriver has two sons with Arnold Schwarzenegger, ages 24 and 28 did not specify which son asked such a ridiculous question.
Senator Ted Cruz decided to enlighten her:
“Pretty stunning that she’s an @nbc anchor. She ‘doesn’t have an answer.’ Try this: (1) He WAS charged with six counts. That thing that just finished was his trial. (2) A jury of his peers found him not guilty. (3) Why? The defense argued he was engaged in self-defense. (4) What facts support self defense? – the three people shot all chased him, assaulted him and/or tried to grab his gun – ALL THREE were convicted felons (on served 15 years for child molesting) – the defense argued Rittenhouse feared for his life (5) You might personally disagree, but the jury heard evidence & presumably concluded he was acting to defend himself from what he reasonably perceived to be an imminent threat to his life. (6) Also, ALL THREE of the people shot were White (contrary to false media reports). (7) Generally ‘white supremacists’ don’t shoot White people. (8) Numerous Dem politicians & corporate media outlets (including your employer and especially @msnbc) recklessly alleged he was a white supremacist. (9) NO evidence was adduced at trial to support that claim. (10) A whole bunch of those corrupt media outlets are now retaining defamation lawyers, because they’re ALL about to get sued—and the liability could well be massive. @mariashriver hope that helps!”
Others who added to Cruz’s explanation:
Author Jim Hanson: “It’s simple Maria He didn’t commit any crimes Get better sources for information It was very straightforward.
Radio host Jason Rantz: “Easy answer in this imaginary conversation: Kyle Rittenhouse didn’t break the law; his attackers did. Self-defense is still legal, thankfully. And for Maria’s sake: dumb tweets are also legal.”
Actor Nick Searcy: “Tell him he was charged, a jury heard the evidence, and they all agreed that he was innocent.”
“Slightly Offensive” host ElijahSchaffer: “You clearly didn’t watch the trial. You work in media.”
