The LGBT industry’s assault on parental rights has reached a new high with the passage of the California bill this week, which was approved by the state assembly. The act is referred to as An. B 957 would categorize parental refusal to affirm a child’s gender identity as aggressive and favor parents who do so in judicial situations.
The act was co-authored by a woman whose child is transgender and infamous degenerate and California Democrat State Senator Scott Wiener.
After it was revealed that many school districts were allowing kids to start the gender transition approach without their knowledge or consent, the expenses is just the most recent in a string of assaults on parental rights in left-leaning state.
In response, liberal states passed legislation that forbids so-called” gender-affirming maintenance” for adolescents.
Trending: Alan Dershowitz Makes Amazing Predictions About President Trump’s Prison Day. Do You Agree or Disagree?
In California, a mother’s refusal to acknowledge the female identity of their child will now be treated on an equal footing with their history of drug and alcohol abuse, abuse of children, or neglect.
It only takes a small action to get there, according to Friday. ” We are fully aware of their intended course with it. The bill got worse, which surprised me because I didn’t think it was. One Republican bill writer said.
Studies of The Free Beacon.
The rejection of parents to” recognize” their child’s gender identity in the context of prison issues may be considered a violation of health, security, and welfare under the recently revised California law.
The bill, which has already been approved by the State Assembly, calls for judges to favor the parent who” affirms” the child’s preferred identity when deciding disputes over transgender identity in children. A change that the bill’s critics worry will open the door to non-affirmation being treated as abuse was released by the authors earlier this week. The updated version particularly defines” the health, safety, and welfare” of a child to include” a parent-s affirmation of the boy’s female personality.”
Erin Friday remarked,” When you say that gender affirmation is in the child’s best interest for health, safety, and welfare, it takes nothing to say[ non-affirmation ] is now abuse— because you’re not taking care of the health and safety if you aren’t affirming them.”
