Hunter Biden has settled his child support case. While his child won’t receive his last name she will get some of his ridiculous artwork.
According to a court document filed on Thursday, Biden, and the mother of their child, Lunden Alexis Roberts have settled their paternity dispute over their 4-year-old girl.
Hunter and his parents have not acknowledged the child’s existence or relationship to them.
Roberts filed a paternity lawsuit in May 2019. In January 2020, a DNA test determined that Biden was the child’s biological dad “with near certainty.”
Biden agreed, based on the results of a paternity test to pay $20,000 per month in child support.
Trending: BREAKING – Jury Delivers Verdict in Trial of Parkland Resource Officer
After years of fighting through the courts, both parties were able to finally reach a settlement.
According to the agreement, Biden’s estranged child will receive an unknown number of paintings from the amateur artist. According to court documents these paintings “will vary in size, with a minimum of 24×24.”
Hunter Biden Painting
“The child will select the painting that will either be sent directly to the child, or to a gallery designated Lunden Roberts. The net proceeds from any sales of artwork shall be wired into an account designated by Lunden Roberts,” state the court documents.
In 2021, a New York City gallery that displayed Biden’s works estimated their value between $75,000 and $500,000. It has been suggested that the buyers of the amateur paintings spent the money in order to gain favor with Biden’s family, rather than buying a serious work of art.
Lunden Roberts, the father of the child, and Hunter BidenBiden also agreed to pay Roberts on a regular basis, “beginning July 1, 2020, and on the first of each month thereafter” until his daughter reaches the age 18, gets married or passes away.
Both Biden and Roberts will have to “discuss the provision of a college fund for the child” within the next five-years.
Roberts retracted her request to change the last name of her daughter to “Biden”, which her attorneys had argued was “now synonymous with being well educated, successful, financially adroit, and politically powerful”, and would therefore benefit the child’s future.
