House Democrats assert that the FD – 1023, the personal FBI document produced by a secret informant alleging Biden misconduct in Ukraine, contained numerous lies and put the source in danger when Senator Chuck Grassley released it. They’re making both arguments at the same time, which is perplexing. In a memo obtained by The Hill, House Oversight Committee Democratic staff wrote to Democratic lawmakers,” The decision by Chairman Comer and Senator Grassley to formally release the form is in blatant disregard of the safety of FBI animal sources and the integrity of its investigations.”
The form offers no fresh or more evidence to support Democratic claims that the President or Hunter Biden engaged in corruption, in contrast to their messaging. The FD – 1023 form is simply more of the same” conspiracy theories” that have been” thoroughly debunked” and the GOP was wrong to release it because it jeopardizes the confidential human source who was spreading thoroughly disproved conspiracy theories. In contrast, its release merely seeks to breathe new life into years-old conspiracies that were initially peddled by Rudy Giuliani. Although it’s admirable of the Democrats to care so much about this propagandist of disproven conspiracy theories, isn’t he safe if the unidentified person is just making things up? Either the claims are true information from a reliable source or they are disproven conspiracies, but neither can be true at the same time. as long as they are both accurate and inaccurate at the same time. How wish Republicans put that man’s life in danger by spreading false information about Biden! Choose one and follow it. If the form is filled with lies, simply call them a bunch of lies. However, the source is reasonable if House Dems want to claim that the form puts a confidential informant in danger. When people make arguments that are politically expedient without regard for consistency( as has become widespread ), this failure of logic and reason occurs. Demons, such as the DOJ and the FBI, need justifications to carry out a fictitious investigation in order to avoid having to turn over materials( like the form ), which requires them to assert that it is reliable yet though they must assert its falsity in public. Worlds collided with the release of the form, forcing the Democrats to present both arguments simultaneously. However, irrational and entirely self-contradictory arguments are no longer disqualifying or even obvious.
House Democrats claim that Senator Chuck Grassley, who released the FD-1023 document, the confidential FBI report by a confidential FBI informant alleging Biden’s misconduct in Ukraine, contained a bunch lies and endangered the informant. It’s bizarre to see them making both arguments simultaneously. “Chairman Comer and Senator Grassley’s decision to release the form publicly is in flagrant disregard of the safety and integrity of FBI investigations,” House Oversight Committee Democratic Staff wrote to Democratic legislators in a memo
Its release merely seeks to breathe new life into years-old conspiracy theories, initially peddled by Rudy Giuliani, that have been thoroughly debunked.” So the FD-1023 form is just more of the same “conspiracy theories” that have been “thoroughly debunked” and the GOP was wrong to release it because it endangers the confidential human source who was spreading thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories? It’s nice that the Democrats care so much about this anonymous person who spreads debunked conspiracies, but if he was making up stuff, surely he is not in danger? If the form contains false information, simply dismiss it as a bunch lies. This failure of logic and reasoning is what happens when people make arguments based on political convenience without regard for consistency. Dems in the DOJ and FBI need an excuse to continue a fictional probe to avoid having materials (such as the Form) handed over. This means that they must claim that the form is credible while publicly claiming that it is not credible. But self-contradictory, irrational arguments no longer disqualify or are even noticeable.
