The FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton was highlighted by the fact that all of her associates received immunity agreements in” exchange for their cooperation ,” and that after that, their devices were all destroyed and erased. The Hunter Biden investigation, which was followed by a slap-on-the-wrist plea deal, was just another cover-up that pretended to be an investigation. It was simply thrown out the window by a judge. After a three-hour hearing on Wednesday, Judge Maryellen Noreika declined to accept the revised plea agreement between the two parties, which would have given Hunter Biden large legal immunity from all tax crimes committed between 2014 and 2019 as well as any drug or firearm charges. She gave the order for Hunter Biden’s attorneys and prosecutors to come to a new agreement that restricts the constitutional immunity provided to the second son.
After an initial plea deal fell through a series of uncommon last-minute disputes between his attorneys and federal prosecutors, the rejected deal was reached. According to Chris Clark, Hunter Biden’s attorney, the agreement was” void and void” because the second son would never be given permanent legal immunity, according to a top prosecutor in the case. What does lasting legal immunity entail? Nothing. Hunter Biden is therefore entering a not guilty plea while relying on the party to defend him. It’s a cover-up, also the New York Times’ coverage of this constitutional circle has to admit. The judge initially questioned why the strange deal, which offered Hunter Biden large immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal standing to reject it. Leo Wise, a prosecutor, responded,” No, your honor ,” when she inquired as to whether there was any precedent for the type of deal being proposed.” Why strike the deal that removes the judge from the decision-making process?” because the game is rigged. The agreement was constantly portrayed by Hunter Biden’s attorneys as the conclusion of the five-year investigation into the president’S son. When Leo Wise, the prosecutor, was asked if the Biden investigation was” ongoing ,” Judge Maryellen Noreika quickly pierced that claim. In order to stall congressional investigations, the investigation must be” going on ,” but it must also be finished so that Hunter Biden can continue at the same time. He responded” yes” and said that if the biden’s team disagreed,” then there is no deal.” In the purely technical sense, which states allow senators from that state to choose judges independently of party, the Democrat media frequently refers to Judge Maryellen Noreika as a Trump appointee. Local Democrats supported Neureika, who was being considered by Biden for another criminal appointment( safe to say that is then deceased) and who had ruled against a lawsuit brought by the computer repairman who discovered Hunter’s laptops. She isn’t exactly MAGA, so it’s safe to say that, but this might have just been a bridge to much. A member of Hunter Biden’s legitimate team was accused of misrepresenting herself in a phone call to the court by the judge, who will hear his plea deal on Wednesday. This strange incident led to sanctions, despite the defendants’ insistence that it was all just misunderstanding.
U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika issued a brief order on Tuesday afternoon stating that an employee of Latham & amp, Watkins, an law firm that represents the president’s son, had falsely claimed to work for the court clerk in an effort to persuade the clerk to remove documents that purportedly contained Bidens’ personal tax information. Additionally, it’s likely that the parliamentary distribution of information about the Biden crime family was ineffective. Judge Maryellen Noreika came to the conclusion that she didn’t want to stamp out overt corruption. Very few people in the political or legal systems share this sentiment, which is unfortunate. Hunter Biden would enter a preliminary diversion agreement to avoid facing felony charges for illegally purchasing an illegitimate handgun while under the influence of illegal drugs, according to U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who announced this in court filing at the time that he would admit guilt to failing to pay taxes in 2017 and 2018.
In his June 20 filing, Weiss omitted to mention that the agreement would even give Hunter Biden legal immunity for any tax offenses committed between 2014 and 2019. As a result, Hunter’s team will presently collaborate with the prosecutors of his father on an unobtrusive cover-up.
Judge Maryellen Noreika rejected a revised plea agreement between the two parties following a three-hour Wednesday hearing. The revised deal would have given Hunter Biden broad immunity from all tax offenses that occurred between 2014 and 2019 as well as any firearm or drug charges. She ordered prosecutors to negotiate a new agreement that would limit the immunity offered to Hunter Biden.
The deal was rejected after an initial plea agreement collapsed due to a series unusual disputes between his lawyers and federal prosecutors. Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Chris Clark, declared the agreement “null” and “void” after the New York Times reported that a top prosecutor said it wouldn’t provide the first son with permanent legal immunity. Nothing. Hunter Biden pleads not guilty, assuming the party will protect his innocence. Even the New York Times’ coverage of this legal case has admitted it is a cover-up. She asked Leo Wise if the deal was precedent-setting. He replied, “No. Your honor.” Why strike a deal where the judge has no say? Hunter Biden’s attorneys have repeatedly portrayed the deal as the end of the five-year investigation into the president’s child. Judge Maryellen Noreika quickly shattered that assertion when she asked a prosecution, Leo Wise if the Biden probe was “ongoing.” Wise replied “yes,” and added that if Biden’s team thought otherwise, then “there’s no deal.” The investigation must be “ongoing” to stalemate the congressional investigations but it also needs to be over to allow Hunter Biden to move on. Noreika had been backed by local Democrats, was considered by Biden to be a judge (safe to assume that’s now dead), and had ruled in favor of the computer repairman’s lawsuit who found Hunter Biden’s laptops. It’s safe to say that Noreika is not MAGA. But this may have been a bridge to far. The judge who will review Hunter Biden’s plea deal on Tuesday accused a member Biden’s legal team of misrepresenting themselves in a telephone call to the court.
Judge Maryellen Norreika didn’t want blatant corruption to be rubber-stamped. It’s a shame that not enough people in the political and legal system share this view. Attorney David Weiss stated in a court document at that time, that Hunter Biden would admit to not paying taxes in 2017 and 2018 and enter a pretrial agreement to avoid felony accusations for illegally buying a handgun when addicted to illegal drugs.
Weiss failed to mention in his filing on June 20 that the agreement would grant Hunter Biden immunity for any tax offenses committed during the six-year span from 2014 through 2019. Hunter’s team is now working with his dad’s prosecutor’s office on a slightly more obnoxious covering-up.
