For a good legal analysis, one can typically rely on Alan Dershowitz. He has been a lifelong registered Democrat who has long been good to Trump in his constitutional analysis. When I say fair, I mean that he simply expresses his honest opinion rather than the MSM story.
You do realize that, don’t you?
Yes, I am aware that someone in the comments will claim he was on Epstein Island, making him unreliable.
That is not the article’s purpose.
You can debate that to your heart’s content, but right now I think his analysis is accurate.
Dershowitz claims that Jack Smith’s case is WEAK — laughably weak — and that it fails the” Banana Republic Test.”
However … Dershowitz claims that if Trump were found guilty by a biased jury, the Supreme Court would overturn it in an instant.
Trump would lose the appeal in the circuit court, but he would prevail in court.
Watch this:
According to Alan Dershowitz, the Supreme Court image will overturn Trump’s conviction. qeo1YN8JVg on twitter.com
August 2, 2023, The Post Millennial (@ TPostMillennial )
Below is a longer breakdown of Dershowitz’s conversation with Glenn Beck:
This doesn’t satisfy the Banana Republic test, Alan Dershowitz tells @ glennbeck. Presidents in Banana Republics prosecute their social rivals, and the likelihood that they will do so increases with their poll numbers. pic. twitter.com / uTUnom7MPG
August 2, 2023, TheBlaze(@ theblaze )
additionally from Newsmax:
When pursuing the opponent of the current president, the bar should be extremely large. Then, banana republic is getting closer to us. Presidents prosecute their social rivals there, and that is not what we want in America. — Alan Dershowitz image twitter.com / cQhFNNy2qy
– August 2, 2023, NEWSMAX(@ NEWSMAx )
From the Post Millenial, how’s more:
The alleged” efforts to overturn the 2020 election” via the events that culminated in the January 6 Capitol riot were the subject of still another indictment against Donald Trump by Biden’s Department of Justice on Tuesday. Conspiracy to defraud the government, conspiracy to obstruct a legal proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to do so, and conspiracy against rights were the four charges brought by particular prosecutor Jack Smith.
Following the announcement, attorney and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz met with Fox News’ Sean Hannity to discuss the former president’s legitimate options, arguing that even though he was likely to be found guilty, the Supreme Court would overturn the decision.
Dershowitz began,” They assert that Donald Trump really thought he lost the election, that everything his actions were dishonest, and that they plotted with unidentified attorneys to sway the outcome.”
” You are permitted to contest elections. The government has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump really believed he lost the election and acted in opposition to that belief. In fact, the best way to challenge elections is to create an elector slate.
a commercial
There is no smoking gun, he added. There is no one who can vouch for the fact that Donald Trump told him,” I know physically I lost the election ,” in his testimony. There is a ton of evidence that he was informed that the election had been lost, but you are aware of Donald Trump and are confident in his ability to form his own opinion.
Alan Dershowitz is usually a reliable source for a fair legal opinion. A lifelong registered Democrat, he has been fair to Trump for years in his legal analysis — and by fair, I mean he gives his honest opinion without relying on the MSM narrative.
Imagine that, right?
I know that someone will say in the comments that he was on Epstein Island and therefore can’t be relied upon.
This article is not about that.
You can debate that all you want, but I think his analysis is spot on.
Dershowitz says that the case brought forward by Jack Smith is WEAK – laughably weak – and doesn’t pass “Banana Republic Test”.
But ….if Trump was convicted by a corrupted juror, Dershowitz said the Supreme Court would overturn it immediately.
Trump would lose the appeal to the circuit court but win at the Supreme Court.
Watch Here:
Alan Dershowitz says Trump conviction will be overturned by the Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/qeo1YN8JVg
The Post-Millennial (@TPostMillennial), August 2, 2023
Here is a longer version of Dershowitz’s conversation with Glenn Beck.
Alan Dershowitz tells Glennbeck @glennbeck “This does not satisfy the Banana Republic Test.” In Banana Republics presidents will prosecute their political rivals and the more popular they are in the polls the more likely it is that they will be prosecuted. pic.twitter.com/uTUnom7MPG
TheBlaze (@theblaze), August 2, 2023
Newsmax:
“The standard should very high when you are going after the opponent of the incumbent president. We’d be on the verge of a banana republic if we didn’t do this. “That’s when presidents prosecute political opponents, and that’s what we don’t want in America.” — Alan Dershowitz pic.twitter.com/cQhFNNy2qy
NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX), August 2, 2023
Here’s a little more from the Post Millenials:
Biden’s Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it had filed a second indictment against Donald Trump. This time, the indictment was based on alleged “efforts” to overturn 2020 elections via the events which culminated in the riots of the 6th of January at the Capitol. Special Prosecutor Jack Smith has announced four charges, including conspiracy to defraud government, conspiracy to obstruct a proceeding, obstruction and attempt to obstruct a proceeding, and conspiracy against the rights.
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard professor and lawyer, sat down to discuss the former President’s legal prospects with Sean Hannity of Fox News. He suggested that, while he was likely to be convicted, he would have the ruling overturned by the Supreme Court.
Dershowitz began by saying, “They claim that Donald Trump believed he had lost the election. They claim that everything he has done is fraudulent. They claim that he conspired to influence the election with unnamed attorneys.”
“You can challenge elections.” It is true that the best way to contest elections is to create a slate of alternate voters… The government must prove beyond a reasonable degree of doubt that Donald Trump subjectively believed that he had lost the election, and acted in a manner contrary to this belief.”
Advertisement
He continued, “There is no smoking-gun.” “There is no credible witness who can testify that Donald Trump told him, “I know personally that I lost the election”. There is a lot evidence that people told Trump that he lost the elections, but you are familiar with Donald Trump and you know he will make his own decision.
