The daughter of then-House Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi and other electors requested an” intelligence briefing” from Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on December 12( or D12 ) about how” Russian interference was performed to help Donald Trump get elected.” The legendary Steele dossier was created by former American intelligence agent Christopher Steel, who distributed it through the FBI and used it to undermine the Electoral College and sabotage the national election. Hillary Clinton and her older campaign officials were conscious that they had invented the lie that the Russians had helped Trump win the presidency. The Clinton campaign supported a plan to persuade Electoral College members to abdicate their duties and taint the results of the election. Voting must be done in accordance with the total number of votes cast. A” briefing” on the Clinton campaign’s manufactured conspiracy theories served no purpose other than to influence voters’ votes. The move was appropriately referred to as an” Electoral College Coup” in The Wall Street Journal. ” A briefing on all investigative findings, as these matters directly impact the core factors in our deliberations of whether Mr. Trump is fit to serve as President of the United States ,” Pelosi’s daughter and other Democratic electors requested. Additionally, they were requesting it from Clapper, who would promote the Steele dossier and claim that its conspiracies were supported by evidence. Trump would be deemed unqualified by Clapper, who would use language akin to that of the Democratic electors. The” electors” letter, according to the Clinton campaign, raises very serious concerns about our national security, supporting the proposed Electoral College coup. The Clinton campaign, members of Congress, and a variety of famous people, including Michael Moore and Martin Sheen, supported the attempted coup.” Electors have grave responsibility under the Constitution. We support their efforts to have their questions addressed.” The Electoral College Was Meant to Prevent Men Like Trump From Becoming President, according to an Atlantic article by anti-Israel activist Peter Beinart. House Democrats, on the other hand, advocated for a coup and seizing power. ” I do believe that Donald Trump should not be elected president by the Electoral College. Rep. Jim Himes( D-Conn. ) argued that while that will result in a fascinating legal issue, I would prefer to have one than learn that the White House was now the Kremlin’s main ally. Previous Rep. Carol-Shea Porter, coming majority leader of the New York State Senate Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D. C. Councilwoman Anita Bonds and numerous other Democrats all signed the elector coup letter. They haven’t all received the same treatment as Trump’s backup voters. In the end, the disloyal electors coup failed and is generally forgotten. However, the Trump indictment has restored its relevance. The exact grounds are covered by Clinton ally Jack Smith’s indictment of the previous president. In his words, Smith charged Trump with” spreading lies” and then participating in a plot to” obstruct” the” lawful federal government function” by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified. Democrats instead sought to sway the electorate by creating new slates. Democrats and the Clinton campaign spread misleading information about the 2016 presidential election because they had made it up. By encouraging disloyal voters to support Hillary over Trump, the political college coup attempted to obstruct the proper process. To” create an extreme regional atmosphere of mistrust and anger” that could be used to overturn an election, all of this was accomplished through dishonest attempts based on conspiracy theories. Through a campaign to sway voters, the Clinton campaign and the Democrats were not only engaging in” conspiracy against the right to vote” of specific individuals but also of sizable groups of people. There were all the components that Jack Smith used to characterize his criticism of Trump. No one had given this coup any serious consideration when it was being carried out by the Democrats and the Clinton campaign. It’s not really improper to engage in filthy democratic politics. Almost all previous presidents prior to the 20th century would have been imprisoned if they were. In the 1800 election, Alexander Hamilton put forth many more drastic solutions. Elections like those in 1876 and 1888 were merely stolen through a variety of ruses. Legal and unlawful shenanigans are distinct from one another. For instance, voter fraud is prohibited, and the courts must decide on election slates made up of additional voters and disloyal voters. Following up on the work of the House Democrat J6 committee, Jack Smith’s decision to criminalize election contesting is extremely risky and reopens the Russiagate debate. The proposed political coup and the ways in which the Clinton campaign used its false claims of Soviet intervention should lead to similar indictments in addition to the government’s numerous improper acts and abuses in the Russiagate case. It is clear that Democratic operative Jack Smith won’t be accusing his previous boss. Democrats must deal with the repercussions if they want to make election challenges illegal. particularly considering that they will repeat some of the same stunts if they lose in 2024. Just a crooked banana republic is deserving of this double standard, where prosecutions and exonerations are determined by political party more than the specific crimes committed. There is more than one political party to which laws can apply. Democrats assert that the urgent threats to democracy gave them the right to call for a coup in 2016, criminalize election challenges in 2020, and possibly another one in 2024. However, authoritarian governments and their kangaroo courts operate in this manner. While her mother pushed the J6 committee that made political college election challenges illegal in 2022, Christine Pelosi was in favor of a coup in 2016. Here, the crooked hypocrisy is at its most obvious. After reviewing the J6 committee’s findings, it might be time for Congress’ social members to start looking into the 2016 election coup proposal and how the Clinton campaign and the House Democrats contributed to its subversion of a crucial government function. Then, all of a sudden, Democrats will realize that even fascists would try to suppress or criminalize electoral coups, which are basically the pinnacle of patriotic democracy. Because the goose should be pushed down the gander’s craw because it is great for them.
The Clinton campaign endorsed a move that would influence members of Electoral Colleges to ignore their duty and tamper with the electoral votes. The Electors must vote according to the ballot count. The Wall Street Journal called the move an “Electoral College Coup”. Clapper would use similar language as the Democrat electors to describe Trump as unfit. The Clinton campaign endorsed the proposed Electoral College Coup by claiming the “electors letter” raises grave issues involving national security. We support the Electors’ efforts to get their questions answered. In an article in the Atlantic, anti-Israel activist Peter Beinart claimed that “The Electoral College was Meant to Prevent Men Like Trump from Being President”. House Democrats argued for a coup, a power grab. “I think the Electoral College shouldn’t choose Donald Trump as president.” This will create a fascinating legal problem. However, I would prefer to have a legal problem than to discover that the White House is now the Kremlin’s chief ally,” said Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn. The elector coup letter was written by former Rep. Carol Shea Porter, future New York State Senate majority leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and D.C. Councilwoman Anita Bonds. It was also backed by other Democrats. The faithless electors’ coup collapsed and was largely forgotten. The Trump indictment made it relevant again. The indictment of former president by Clinton ally Jack Smith covered the same bases. Smith has indicted Trump, in his own words, for having “spread lie” and then engaging a conspiracy to ‘obstruct’ the “lawful federal function by which the results are collected, counted, and certified by federal government.” The electoral college coup was a deliberate attempt to undermine the process by inciting disloyal electors to vote for Hillary over Trump. The Clinton campaign and Democrats were not only engaging in a “conspiracy to suppress the right to vote”, but also of large groups through a campaign of corrupting electors. All of the ingredients Jack Smith used in his indictment against Trump were present. Dirty electoral politics is not actually illegal. If they were, then nearly every president before the 20th Century would have been in prison. Alexander Hamilton had proposed far more radical remedies during the 1800 election. Some elections, such as those of 1876 and1888, were stolen through various shenanigans. There is a fine line between legal and illicit shenanigans. The decision by Jack Smith to criminalize the disputing elections, in response to the work of the House Democrat J6 Committee, is dangerous and reopens Russiagate. Beyond the various illegal acts and abuses committed by the government in the pursuit of Russiagate, the proposed electoral coup and the ways in which the Clinton campaign utilized its fraudulent claims of Russian intervention, ought to trigger similar indictments.Obviously Jack Smith, a Democrat operative, is not about to indict his former boss. If Democrats want to criminalize challenges to election results, they will have to face the consequences. Democrats claim that the urgent threats to democracy entitle them to call an electoral coup in 2016, criminalize election challenges by 2020, and perhaps call for another coup by 2024. It is the way totalitarian regimes work. In 2016, Christine Pelosi advocated an electoral coup, but in 2022, her mother pushed the J6 Committee which criminalized electoral challenges. The hypocrisy could not be more obvious. Then, Democrats will realize that electoral coups represent the ultimate expressions of patriotic democracy. Only fascists would try to suppress or criminalize them.
