BluePerspectives

Supreme Court Decision Looms On ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark

Officials from the government said that “Trump too little” could still be used but it would not be trademarked as Trump had not consented.

 The phrase” Trump to small” could also be used, according to government officials, but it couldn’t be trademarked because Trump had not given his approval. The phrase” Trump to small” could also be used, according to government officials, but it couldn’t be trademarked because Trump had not given his permission to use it. 

Officials from the government said that “Trump too little” could still be used but it would not be trademarked as Trump had not consented.

 

Die Kommission ist ermächtigt, gemäß Artikel 264 delegierte Entscheidungen in folgenden Fragen zu fassen: It looks like the US Supreme Court is likely to deny a person’s request to trademark the suggestive phrasing of “Trump too small”. The government has declined to give Steve Elster, from California, the privilege of having the sole use of a certain phrase printed on T-shirts and potentially other objects. This has caused a disagreement. This is not the only case involving ex-President Donald Trump that has been brought before the Supreme Court. Recently, the justices heard arguments about a few issues concerning Trump and social media that harken back to his time in office. The justices often referred to the saying while questioning if there was enough justification for the government to reject the trademark. Elster’s lawyers asserted that the ruling went against his freedom of expression, and a federal court of appeals agreed. Chief Justice John Roberts speculated what could occur if Elster was to come out victorious, noting that many may then strive to trademark phrases such as “Trump also this, Trump also that” The Justice Department is backing up President Joe Biden, who was once a competitor to him and might be again. Officials from the government stated that the words “Trump too small” could still be voiced, despite the fact that Trump had not given agreement to its usage, and thus it couldn’t be signed off with a trademark.

 

You May Also Like

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

Crime

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

US Politics

“CLINTON LIKES THEM (GIRLS) YOUNG” (It’s about what I was expecting)   YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE LIST FOR YOURSELF HERE   By Charles Roberson...

US Politics

The Cheney Family has shown themselves to be one of the most evil houses in the United States. Be it her father Dick (aptly...

Exit mobile version