The New York Times suggests that the person who leaked Dobbs’ opinion last year was a conservative.
According to The New York Times, the unidentified person who leaked the Dobbs opinion previous year might have been a liberal. According to The New York Times, the unidentified person who leaked the Dobbs opinion previous year might have been a liberal.
The New York Times suggests that the person who leaked Dobbs’ opinion last year was a conservative.
LOADINGERROR LOADING. A detailed New York Times report published Friday offered fresh insight into how a Supreme Court dominated by conservatives succeeded in overturning nationwide abortion rights nearly 50 years after Roe v. Wade — including how a coalition to preserve the landmark case broke down.. The Supreme Court’s decision in June 2022 came a month after a draft of the majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, had been leaked to Politico.. Advertisement. Internally, the leak had huge implications at the high court, the Times said. Before the draft was made public, Chief Justice John Roberts and now-retired Justice Stephen Breyer had reportedly been trying to pull together a compromise solution in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.. Breyer had even reportedly considered siding with the court’s conservatives in order to save Roe by taking a hammer to its abortion protections.. The Roe decision, made in 1973, preserved a person’s right to an abortion before the fetus could survive on its own. The Dobbs compromise might have set the new line at 15 weeks’ gestation, following the Mississippi law that the case was brought to challenge.. Breyer and Roberts had also reportedly hoped to convince newer Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to join them on middle ground.. Advertisement. But the leak stopped all that, the Times reported.. The leaker’s identity is still unknown. The Times argued, however, that the effect was clearly favorable for the court’s ultraconservatives, Justices Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.. The Politico report indicated how most of the justices intended to vote, helping to lock them in — even though Barrett and Roberts had reportedly opposed taking up the case in the first place. (Barrett initially voted for taking up the case but changed her mind, the Times said.). The outlet described a single-minded effort by Alito and Thomas to ram the Dobbs case through the court after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in order to accomplish the conservative legal movement’s decadeslong goal of killing Roe. The Times even presented evidence that Alito had secretly circulated his draft opinion among his conservative allies to strengthen support: Gorsuch reportedly signed off on Alito’s 98-page draft in just 10 minutes once it was shared by a staffer on Feb. 10, 2022.. The picture that emerges in the Times piece is that of a fractured court with tenuous power dynamics that Roberts may be struggling to control.. An investigation by the marshal of the Supreme Court failed to uncover the leaker’s identity earlier this year — although Alito said he has a “pretty good idea” of who it was.. Advertisement. Support HuffPost. The Stakes Have Never Been Higher. At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.. Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.. Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.. At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.. Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.. As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost’s journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.. We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.. As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.. Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.. Support HuffPost. Related. Supreme Court new york timesroe v wadeabortion rightssamuel alito. Republicans Nominate Mazi Melesa Pilip To Succeed George Santos. Hulu Doc Is A Poignant Snapshot Of LGBTQ+ Families In America’s Conservative Heartland. Trump Election Case Court Deadlines Paused As He Pursues Presidential Immunity Claims. GOP Ducks Questions About Texas Woman Denied Abortion Despite Threat To Her Life
