Tanya Chutkan, a federal judge in Washington D.C., ruled Friday that Donald Trump is not immune from criminal prosecution because of his role in trying to overturn the election for 2020. Chutkan: “Defendant’s four-year service in the position of Commander in Chief didn’t bestow upon him the divine rights of kings that govern his fellow citizens to evade criminal accountability,”
Donald Trump is hardly immune from legal charges because of his involvement in the effort to rig the 2020 election, Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled on Friday.
In a strongly worded 48-page order, Chutkan stated that” Defendant’s four-year service as Commander in Chief did not bestow upon him the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his own citizens.” He also rejected Trumps attempt to postpone the trial scheduled for March 2024, where he faces criminal charges for inciting the January 6 insurrection.
It was the first time a federal court had ruled that an ex-president was no shielded from criminal charges. Chutkan stated that the United States just has one chief executive at a time, and that position does not entitle the holder to an unrestricted “get-out-of-jail-free” pass for the rest of his or her life. ” Executive presidents do not have any specific rights regarding their national legal liability.” For any criminal acts committed while in office, the defendant may be subject to a national investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment.
Trump is not entitled to wide immunity from civil lawsuits that seek to hold him responsible for inciting the uprising on January 6, 2021, according to a federal appeals court in Washington that issued the same decision just hours before Chutkan’s decision.
Trump hopes to run out of time so that he wo n’t have to go through any criminal trials while running for president in 2024. He plans to appeal Chutkan’s order, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. In all four legal cases against him, his attorneys intend to file equivalent motions.
Trump attorneys in Georgia argued on Friday that a trial date of August 2024 for his part in trying to rig the state’s election would amount to “election interference,” oblivious to the irony that his attempt to do the same was precisely that.
” Can you imagine the idea that the Republican nominee for president wo n’t be able to run for office because he is, in some way, defending himself in court?” Trump, according to lead counsel Steven Sadow. ” I do n’t think anyone would want to be in that position, and that would be the most effective election interference in the history of the United States.”
Specific prosecutor Nathan Wade retorted,” This trial does not constitute election interference.” ” This is progressing with the Fulton County business.”
Trump’s team tried to move the Georgia trial from 2024, but they also claimed that if Trump were re-elected, it could n’t happen in 2025 because it would interfere with his presidential responsibilities.
As he outlines his plan for a second term, Trump has adopted an increasingly autocratic tone. His view of the justice system—that he is always above the law—is more consistent. Donald Trump’s involvement in trying to sway the 2020 election does not grant him immunity from legal charges, Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled on Friday. According to Chutkan,” Defendant’s four-year tenure as Commander in Chief did never grant him the divine right of kings to avoid the fugitive accountability that governs his own citizens.”
Tanya Chutkan, a federal judge in Washington D.C., ruled Friday that Donald Trump is not immune from criminal prosecution because of his role in trying to overturn the election for 2020. Chutkan: “Defendant’s four-year service in the position of Commander in Chief didn’t bestow upon him the divine rights of kings that govern his fellow citizens to evade criminal accountability,”
2, 2006
Donald Trump, ex-Commander-in-Chief, was present in anticipation of testifying at his legal case of fraud in the New York Supreme Court on November 2, 2006. On June 6th, 2023, it will be located in New York. Dies ist die erste Gelegenheit, in der das Europäische Parlament eine Diskussion über diese Frage geführt hat. On Friday, Judge Tanya Chutkan delivered a strong ruling denying ex-President Donald Trump impunity from criminal prosecution in relation to his involvement in trying to reverse the 2020 election. In her 48-page decision, Chutkan argued that “Defendant’s four-year service as Commander in Chief did not grant him the level of royalty that permits him to evade the criminal responsibility that affects all other citizens.” This is the initial time a federal court has said that a former president is not immune from criminal proceedings. If you want to stay informed, join the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter, and keep up with the news that matters. No matter what protection a president might have while in office, the US has just one head of state at a time, and this role does not give them immunity that lasts a lifetime, Judge Chutkan noted. ”
Former presidents do not have any special exemption from facing federal criminal charges. The defendant could be put under investigation by the federal government, charged with a crime, brought to trial, found guilty, and given a punishment for any criminal behavior carried out while in office. Shortly before a federal court in Washington determined that Trump was not exempt from civil lawsuits that challenge him for prompting the events that took place on January 6, 2021, he declared that he would appeal the decision to the Supreme Court, attempting to buy time to stay clear of criminal proceedings prior to his potential 2024 presidential campaign.
