BluePerspectives

Justice Department Asks Supreme Court To End Delays Of Trump’s Jan. 6 Trial

If he wins the White House, he will be able, if a former president wins in November, to order federal prosecutors drop any unresolved cases against him.

 If the former president were to win the presidency in November, he would be able to direct federal prosecutors to drop any unanswered allegations against him. If the original president were to win the presidency in November, he would be able to direct federal prosecutors to drop any unanswered allegations against him. 

If he wins the White House, he will be able, if a former president wins in November, to order federal prosecutors drop any unresolved cases against him.

 

Die Kommission ist befugt, delegierte Rechtsakte gemäß Artikel 264 in folgenden Bereichen durchzuführen: Federal prosecutors urged the U.S. Supreme Court to promptly proceed with Donald Trump’s trial for his attempted coup, emphasizing the critical importance of resolving the criminal charges quickly. Special counsel Jack Smith stated in a 26-page brief filed on Wednesday that the alleged crimes directly threaten the foundation of American democracy. He described Trump’s actions as an attempt to maintain power and prevent the rightful winner of the 2020 presidential election from assuming office. “The urgent need to address those charges promptly is strong,” he stated. The ex-president has requested the Supreme Court to temporarily halt the prosecution to allow for further appeals, potentially allowing him to instruct the Department of Justice to drop all federal cases against him if he regains the presidency later this year. Trump is contending to the Supreme Court that his false claims of election fraud, which led to the Capitol insurrection in January, are the reason he should be granted this request. On January 6, 2021, the decision to maintain his position of power was considered an official presidential action that protects him from prosecution. He states that he cannot be charged for his actions because the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority required to convict him during the impeachment trial. Additionally, he contends that the Founding Fathers originally planned for presidents to have complete immunity. These arguments were previously dismissed by both trial judge Tanya Chutkan and a panel of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The appellate court decided that the case would go back to Chutkan for trial unless the Supreme Court granted a postponement while reviewing Trump’s request. Supporters of Trump took part in a rally in Washington in January.

 

You May Also Like

Government Corruption

Updated 5/17/19 9:52am Jack Crane | Opinion  James Baker, Former-FBI General Counsel has joined Russian hoax media collaborator Michael Isikoff on his podcast, yesterday....

Crime

I do not even know where to begin with this one.  Just when you think you have seen the worst that humanity has to...

US Politics

“CLINTON LIKES THEM (GIRLS) YOUNG” (It’s about what I was expecting)   YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE LIST FOR YOURSELF HERE   By Charles Roberson...

US Politics

The Cheney Family has shown themselves to be one of the most evil houses in the United States. Be it her father Dick (aptly...