Kari Lake and Mark Finchem are suing Arizona to uphold election integrity, but this is the end of the road. From Kyle Becker: BREAKING. The Supreme Court has decided not to comment on the Arizona Election Integrity Case. Expert testimony provided by the plaintiffs @KariLake and @Mark Finchem indicates that there were significant voting machine flaws, including that the election database’s “placing of the master cryptographic keys on the election database in plain text and exposed gives any actor with access to the voting system full control over the election results.” ” There was a “god key ” detected in the voting machine code. Except for Windows-login, which are easily bypassed, Dominion placed the master encrypted keys in plain text and exposed on the election database. All digital security standards are broken by allowing a destructive actor to control the machine and modify results without being discovered, wrote Patrick Byrne. In addition, due to the process of “reconciliation ” of the Arizona votes, it was “not possible to know the true outcome of voting at 43 voting centers ” because the voting center results were not recorded locally on memory cards. The two plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in federal court in April 2022 against Arizona state and county election officials, alleging that the voting machines were unreliable and should not be used. According to the complaint,” Plaintiffs have a constitutional and statutory right to have their ballots, and all ballots cast up with theirs, counted accurately and honestly but that even legal votes determine the winners of each office contest in the Midterm Election.” Electronic voting machines do not comply with the constitutional and legal requirements to guarantee a free and fair election. They cannot be deemed to be consistently safe. The Supreme Court of the United States disputed the court’s opinion in a critical national election on the subject of election integrity. BREAKING. The Supreme Court has decided not to comment on the Arizona Election Integrity Case. The plaintiffs @KariLake and Mark Finchem have provided expert testimony that shows there were significant voting machine flaws, including the “placing of the master… pic.” twitter. com/Dv3bXcdZhp — Kyle Becker ( @kylenabecker ) April 22, 2024 I have to agree with this reaction: SCOTUS is n’t brave enough to stop the cheating. This is how the Constitutional Republic passes away. # AmericaFirst— Adam B ( @acburkhart ) April 22, 2024 Very disappointing to see this, what could be a more critical issue to hear and resolve right now? Our elections should be run with the best of both worlds, or at least it should be! But, what’s next from these? This video explains backup plans B, C, and D even though the Supreme Court frequently serves as the end of the road: Lake and Finchem’s attorney Kurt Olsen addressed The Gateway Pundit with the next statement:” We are certainly disappointed that the U.S. S. Supreme Court ordered that our opposition to the 2022 election procedures be heard on the merits and refuses to review the decisions of the Arizona district court and the Ninth Circuit. Even though the Supreme Court only grants review in a proportion of the cases that are submitted on petition, we think we have brought a case that needs to be reviewed if the British people want to regain confidence in elections. We learned that the Arizona defendants erroneously represented to the lower courts that Maricopa County complied with state law in some ways after the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. This is unusual for our case. Contrary to what the lower courts told them, Maricopa County did never employ software that had been approved by the U.S. S. According to Arizona law, Maricopa County failed to conduct pre-election “logic and accuracy ” testing on all of its 400+ vote center tabulators in accordance with Arizona law, including the Election Assistance Commission ( “EEC” ). In fact, Maricopa County has been using and uses software that has been quietly altered in the way that ballots are read and compiled. Since Maricopa County contains 62 percent of Arizona voters, what happens that dominates state-wide elections. In addition, evidence has come to light showing that, in the 2020 election, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. , encrypted the master crypto keys in plain text on its election database systems, including Arizona, which were both encrypted in plain text. Doing so violated basic cyber security practices, Federal Information Processing Standards ( “FIPS” ), and EAC certification. Anyone who has access to these systems can use these cryptographic keys to manipulate election results without being caught once they have evaded the fundamental Windows log-in ( which can be accomplished in less than five minutes using instructions available online ). Arizona election officials have been making an effort to avoid having their actions reviewed in court, but they have not already done so. The American people deserve facts, transparency, and truth in how elections are conducted in this Country. Due to a allegedly unfounded claim that the Kari Lake and Mark Finchem case lacked standing to file a lawsuit, the case was dismissed. Hence, the courts, even now, have not ruled on the merits of our case. We will continue to bring up these issues, particularly in light of the future 2024 election. [[{“value”:”
Kari Lake and Mark Finchem have reached the end of their road in their lawsuit to protect election integrity in Arizona.
Kyle Becker
BREAKING.
The Arizona Election Integrity Case has been dismissed by the Supreme Court without comment.
The plaintiffs @KariLake & Mark Finchem have presented expert testimony that indicates there were serious voting machine weaknesses, including “placing the master cryptographic key on the election database unprotected and in plain text allows any actor with complete control over the results of the election.”
The code of the voting machine contained a “godkey”.
“Dominion left the master cryptographic key in plain text, unprotected, on the election database. The only exception is the Windows-login which can be easily bypassed.” Patrick Byrne said that leaving these highly sensitive cryptographic key in this state violates cyber security protocols. It allows a malicious actor take control of the computer and change results without being detected.
Due to the “reconciliation” process of the Arizona votes it was “impossible to know the true result of voting at 43 polling centers” as the results of voting were not recorded on memory cards locally.
In April 2022, before the midterm elections, two plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in federal court against Arizona state and local election officials, claiming that the voting machines were unreliable and therefore should not be used.
The complaint stated that “Plaintiffs are entitled to have their ballots and all ballots cast with them, accurately and transparently counted so that only legal votes will determine the winners of the Midterm Election for each office.”
“Electronic voting systems cannot be deemed reliable secure and do not comply with the constitutional and statutory requirements to guarantee a fair and free election.”
The Supreme Court of the United States decided that the issue of electoral integrity was not worth the court’s attention during another crucial presidential election.
BREAKING.
The Arizona Election Integrity Case has been dismissed by the Supreme Court without comment.
The plaintiffs @KariLake and Mark Finchem has brought forth expert testimony to indicate that there were serious voting machine vulnerabilities, including the “placing of the master… pic.twitter.com/Dv3bXcdZhp
Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker), April 22, 2024
I must agree with this response:
The SCOTUS doesn’t have the courage to stop cheating.
This is how America’s Constitutional Republic dies.
Adam B (@acburkhart), April 22, 2024
This is very disappointing. What could be more important to hear and resolve now?
Integrity of our elections should be paramount…or it should!
What’s next?
This video explains the backup plans B,C and D despite the Supreme Court being often the end of the road.
The Gateway Pundit received the following statement from Kurt Olsen, Lake and Finchem’s lawyer:
We are disappointed that the U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to review decisions made by the Arizona district courts and the Ninth Circuit and ordered that our challenge against the 2022 election procedure be heard on its merits. The Supreme Court only reviews less than 1% of petitions, but we believe that our case was one that demanded to be reviewed if we were to restore confidence to the American People in elections.
Our case was unusual because it was only after the Ninth Circuit upheld the dismissal did we learn that the Arizona defendants had falsely claimed to lower courts that Maricopa county complied with the state law in various respects. Contrary to what they told the lower courts, Maricopa County didn’t use software certified by U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and Maricopa County had failed to perform pre-election testing for “logic and accuracy”, on all of its 400+ vote center tabulators, in accordance with Arizona laws. Maricopa County continues to use software which has been secretly altered in terms of how ballots are read. Maricopa County is home to 62 percent Arizona voters. What happens there has a major impact on elections throughout the state.
Evidence has also been discovered that, during the 2020 elections, Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. left the master cryptographic keys unprotected in the election databases, and in plaintext on its systems in at least five different states, including Arizona. This violated the Federal Information Processing Standards (“FIPS”) and EAC certification. These cryptographic keys allow anyone with access to the systems to manipulate election results without being detected once they bypass Windows’ basic log-in. (Instructions are available online and can be done in under five minutes). Arizona election officials are still trying to avoid any kind of review after these recent discoveries.
The American people deserve transparency, facts, and truth when it comes to how elections are conducted here in the United States. The Kari and Mark Finchem case has been dismissed due to a supposed lack of standing. The courts have not yet ruled on our case. We will continue to raise this issue, especially in light the upcoming election of 2024.
“}]]
