Anyone with a brain can tell that the events that occurred on January 6th, events which were horrific and un-American, did not occur as the media and Democrat narrative would have you believe they did.
Were there Trump supporter who ended up inside the Capitol Building when they were not supposed to be there, yea, I’m sure there were. Were there Trump supporters who committed crimes on that day, I would bet there were. I am not trying to tell you that all Trump supporters are innocent in the day’s events.
HOWEVER, the rally was the PERFECT cover for bad actors to stage or instigate an event that could then be used to vilify ALL Trump supporters and non Democrats/communists.
We know from video evidence that there were a large number of radical leftists on the front lines of the mob breaking into the Capitol, this has been documented by many outlets, perhaps most extensively by, you guessed it, the Gateway Pundit.
They published this article outlining at least 20 individuals directly involved in the ‘insurrection’ who were Aftifa, BLM or far left activists/provocateurs.
Now, if you were going to premeditatedly instigate an event like the one at the Capitol, you would also want to make sure that your bad actor instigators would be able to penetrate security. So, if I were the one planning on staging an event like this, I would want to have decreased security, or inadequate levels of security.
This is where Republicans are alleging Pelosi and Democrats were involved in the setting up of the Jan 6th events.
Throughout the day of the event it was being reported that the authorities were not going to increase their law enforcement presence at the Capitol … even thought then knew hundreds of thousands of people were going to be there, protesting and at a rally which the POTUS was speaking at.
The Epoch Times even reported that Trump offered up 10k National Guard Troops to secure the Capitol, just in case bad actors tried anything, but he was told to pound sand.
Why on Earth did they not take Trump up on this? Well, according to high ranking GOP members of Congress, perhaps the Democrats WANTED these events to occur, and worse yet, perhaps they gave them a little push …
Fox News has published a piece entitled:
House Republicans demand answers from Pelosi on security decisions leading up to Capitol riot
Republicans say there are ‘many important questions’ about Pelosi’s ‘responsibility for the security’
Top Republicans on several committees are demanding answers from Speaker Nancy Pelosi regarding security decisions made leading up to and on the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.
House Administration Committee Ranking Member Rodney Davis, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member James Comer and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes sent a letter to Pelosi, D-Calif., on Monday, saying that “many important questions” about her “responsibility for the security” of the Capitol on Jan. 6 “remain unanswered.”
Davis, Jordan, Comer and Nunes pointed to claims made by former Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund, that he, on Jan. 4, approached the sergeants at arms to request the assistance of the National Guard. Sund, in a letter to Pelosi last month, said the former Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he was concerned about “the optics” and didn’t feel the “intelligence supported it.”
“As you are aware, the Speaker of the House is not only the leader of the majority party, but also has enormous institutional responsibilities,” they wrote. “The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House.”
Pelosi’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.
The Republicans added that for the past two years, they have observed a “very heavy-handed and tightly controlled approach to House operations that has been exerted by yourself, your staff, and an army of appointed House officials.”
“When then-Chief Sund made a request for national guard support on January 4th, why was that request denied?” the Republicans wrote. “Did Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving get permission or instruction from your staff on January 4th prior to denying Chief Sund’s request for the national guard?“
In their letter, the Republicans also pointed to Sund’s Jan. 6 move to notify the Sergeant at Arms of his request for national guard support and said it “took over an hour for his request to be approved because the SAA had to run the request up the chain of command,” saying that chain “undoubtedly included” Pelosi and her “designees.”
Davis, Jordan, Comer and Nunes went on to slam Pelosi for her move to “unilaterally” fire Irving and demand the resignation of Sund.
“These decisions were made in a partisan manner without any consultation of House Republicans and therefore raise questions about the political motivations of your decisions,” they wrote.
Meanwhile, the Republicans pointed to Pelosi’s comments made on Jan. 7 during a press conference, in which she explained her reasoning for demanding Sund’s resignation, saying that he “hasn’t called us since this happened.”
Republicans said that claim was “refuted” by Sund, who “detailed two occasions that he briefed you on the situation on the Capitol campus—the first occurring at 5:36 p.m. and the second at 6:25 p.m., both on January 6th.”‘ You can read the rest of the article HERE.
It’s a shame that not only do the Democrats control the House and it’s subpoena power, but also that most of the GOP is spineless and would never actually do anything that would expose heinous crimes of the colleagues on the left … even if it cost 5 people their lives.
I hate to say it, but I have lost all faith in our nation’s institutions. If you told me 10 years ago that I wouldn’t trust the results of a Presidential Election or that I would think it’s possible that the government stood down and let the Jan 6th events occur, I would say you were crazy … yet here we are.
This is not good. Once a government loses trust, it is only a matter of time before all else is lost.
