After a ridiculously slow start, Special Counsel John Durham is picking up steam and this may finally put Hillary behind bars where she deserves to be. It’s one thing to spy on a private citizen, but it gets serious very quickly when you spy on the President in the White House. Serious enough that at least one person is not willing to fall on their sword for you. And it only takes one, unless they start committing suicide willingly or not.
Did Hillary and her team pay techies to hack into the Trump Tower and the White House in an effort to frame President trump by planting fake evidence of Russian collusion? Or was big bucks donors footing the bill? We do know for a fact that Hillary hired her law firm Perkins Coie to create the fake dossier used to initiate investigations into Trump in order to get one of the worst candidates ever into the Oval Office.
This group was led by Indiana University professor and staunch Hillary supporter, Jean Camp. Professor Camp, according to Circa was a staunch Hillary supporter:
A respected computer scientist who raised concerns about a possible connection between President Trump and a Russian bank is an unabashed Hillary Clinton supporter who made multiple small donations to the Democrat’s presidential campaign around the time she and her colleagues surfaced the allegations.
NEW: Lawyers for #Clinton campaign paid a tech company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to #TrumpTower& later the WH, in order to establish an "inference" & "narrative" to bring to govt agencies linking #Trump to #Russia, #specialcounsel #JohnDurham sayshttps://t.co/OFHPOX5FZx
— Brooke Singman (@BrookeSingman) February 12, 2022
From The Gateway Pundit
There now is evidence lawyers paid tech specialists, including university personnel to infiltrate Trump servers.
Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an “inference” and “narrative” to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.
Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.
The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work “for any client” when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel” between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.
But Durham’s filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled “Factual Background,” reveals that Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”
…Durham’s filing states that in July 2016, the tech executive worked with Sussman, a U.S. investigative firm retained by Law Firm 1 on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers and employees at multiple internet companies to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”
“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
“Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” Durham states. “In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”
