100 Percent Fed Up reports –
This morning, Mike Lindell appeared on Steve Bannon’s War Room where he revealed that Part III of the independent forensic report on Mesa County, Colorado’s Dominion vote tabulator (upon the direction of the now-dismissed County Clerk Tina Peters) is now available. (See HERE.) The report was prepared by Doug Gould, chief technical officer of Cyber Team US. Gould is an expert in Cyber Security with more than 40 years of experience in the field. He retired from AT&T after 31 years, where he served as Chief Cyber Security Strategist.
Mr. Lindell told War Room host Steve Bannon that his team of lawyers plans to use the new evidence in order to get injunctions to force states to sideline their machines. He says they will be beginning in seven states. He did not mention the states they plan to start with.
Watch the interview here, which begins at 7:10 min. mark:
The summary of the key findings was entered into a report by Doug Gould. What they found was that information that they are required to save for 22 months under federal law and 25 months under state law had been deleted in Mesa County. Legally, that is a no-no.
These statutory requirements establish that voting systems are required to generate and preserve, as critical to the
ability to determine and reproduce the conditions and details of election conduct using these systems, logfiles of all
system functions, including normal activity, connectivity, file and data access, operator- and automated-processes,
and errors. Logfiles are critical to the ability to detect improper operation, including the ability to detect malicious
intrusions as well as other improper activities and conditions, and configuration changes that could enable alteration
of the actual vote count.
Official to discharge her statutory obligations. The facts and resultant findings support the conclusions that:
1) Election-related data explicitly required to be preserved, as stated in the 2002 VS criteria referenced in
this section, have been destroyed in violation of Federal and State law, and
2) Due to non-compliance with the 2002 VS requirements, these voting systems and accompanying
vendor-provided, Colorado Secretary of state-approved procedures cannot meet the certification
requirements of the State of Colorado, and should not have been certified for use in the state.
