The Oscars decided to implement strict diversity and inclusion guidelines for films to be eligible for the” Best Picture” award this week, which will only serve to divide their already rapidly dwindling viewer base. The Oscars’ viewership has decreased by almost half in only six years, from 43 million viewers in 2014 to 23 million in 2020, and from a pitiful 16.6 million to 2022.
The novel diversity and inclusion standards established by the Oscars, which will require movies to submit a list of all minority actors to the nominating committee if they want to be considered, are currently infuriating directors and actors.
Some people in the industry favor the fresh regulations, according to one director who spoke with the Post.
Imagine if fantastic movies weren’t produced because of studio or business requirements that every movie meet the criteria for a Best Picture nomination. The director continued.
Trending: One Florida Rep. Makes A Strong Move After 20 House Republicans Vote Against Censuring Adam Schiff Over His Russia Collusion Propaganda
When questioned about the innovative diversity and inclusion standards, classic actor Richard Dreyfuss responded without hesitation, claiming that they” made him vomit.”
” This is an art form, but it’s also a form of commerce, and it makes money.” And no one should be telling me that I have to accept the most recent definition of morality because I’m an artist. He added more.
News reports from FOX.
New diversity rules for Best Picture’s” completely ridiculous” https :// t.co / EbhubyUg7T pic, according to Oscar voters. QVb5MaqINE / twitter.com
16 June 2023, New York Post(@ nypost ).
Following the implementation of novel diversity and inclusion guidelines for 2024, the Academy Awards are receiving a lot of criticism.
Any movie in the running for a” Best Picture” Oscar must follow the rules.
After the Academy Awards unveiled its Aperture 2025 initiative, a comprehensive set of rules intended to make Hollywood more equitable and varied, some voting members raised the alarm.
During a conversation with The Post, one director remarked,” It’s completely insane.”
” I support diversity, but why force you to choose specific types of candidates if you want to be nominated?” That makes the entire procedure artificial. The role should go to the person who is qualified for it. Why should you be constrained in your options? However, that is the world we live in. This is absurd.
