Glenn Kirschner stated that the strategy “never works well for a defendant who is a big liar, like Donald Trump.”
According to Glenn Kirschner, the tactic “never works effectively for a testifying defendant like Donald Trump is.” According to Glenn Kirschner, the tactic “never works effectively for a testifying defendant who is an enormous liar like Donald Trump is.”
Glenn Kirschner stated that the strategy “never works well for a defendant who is a big liar, like Donald Trump.”
Die Kommission kann gemäß Artikel 264 delegierte Beschlüsse in folgenden Bereichen fassen: Glenn Kirschner, a prior U.S. Army prosecutor, stated on Tuesday why Donald Trump’s habitual “attempt everything and see what succeeds” methodology is probably not going to be effective in his upcoming court hearing concerning his involvement in the interference of the election. Judge Tanya Chutkan, in charge of the trial, decided last week that Trump is not able to allege presidential immunity from the federal criminal prosecution, which is one of the four indictments he is encountering. On the most recent episode of the podcast “The Legal Breakdown,” hosted by Kirschner and Brian Tyler Cohen, Cohen inquired what protection is available to Trump. Kirschner posited that the “reasonable doubt” defense is potentially the most likely lead strategy for the Republican 2024 presidential campaign. Kirschner predicted that Trump’s legal team would seek to discredit every witness, document, or piece of evidence presented. He noted this may be a successful strategy, however, he opined that there is such a robust case against Trump that it may ultimately be ineffective. Kirschner anticipated that Trump would not have a chance of being acquitted since he did not have any strong defences to use. She elaborated that his outlandish claims would not be allowed in the trial unless he decided to take the stand and testify himself, where he would be allowed to say whatever he desired. Then Jack Smith’s lawyers will question him closely and essentially tear him apart on the stand. Ik weet zeker dat het weer zal gebeuren”. De Ik heb eerder iets gedaan. Ik ben er zeker van dat het nog een keer zal gebeuren. I have questioned RICO defendants in the past.
