[[{“value”:”Do you remember Loy Brunson and the Brunson Brothers?
Of course you do.
Amazing families and amazing people.
And of course, Loy is best known for the outstanding cases they brought before the US Supreme Court regarding the 2020 election, particularly given that Loy is certainly an attorney.
Only someone who has actually sat down to read the Constitution. Imagine that!
The Brunson Brothers ‘ cases have sparked so much optimism, but the result has been disappointment as they are both dismissed, rejected, or simply ignored.
But are they dead?
I am aware that so many of you ( including myself ) are in need of a refresh. and I have n’t had much to share with you up until now.
But I just came across a brand new interview Loy Brunson did only a couple weeks ago on May 25, 2024, and it comes with an extraordinary message of hope and optimism!
Loy claims that the case is still active.
He claims that the Supreme Court could take it back at any time, that it is entirely up to them, and that it could happen today, tomorrow, a week from today, etc. There is nothing stopping them from picking it back off.
Perhaps… at the most advantageous time?
Oh my, would n’t that make for an incredible end to this movie!
Watch this fresh interview first, though I’ll provide you with a lot more information later in the comments section below.
LOY BRUNSON DECLARES THE 2020 ELECTION FIGHT ISN’T OVER: SUPREME COURT CASE COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING! pic. twitter.com/g4oGjaL6Eo
June 6, 2024— Daily Noah.com ( @Daily NoahNews ).
The next update we had from Loy was back in May of 2023 and it actually comes from my interview with him.
It was a pleasure to chat with him and incredibly helpful!
I have all of those links down below for you, particularly the letter writing campaign, and a lot of this is also important.
Supreme Court Compromised? Why Does Loy Brunson Also Think We Can Win?
On my show, I had the real honor of speaking with Loy Brunson the another day.
What a class act and a beautiful mind.
I had a wonderful time talking with him and posing a lot of questions to him about the pending Supreme Court case.
How can we possibly expect the Supreme Court to rule in your favor if one of the questions I asked him was:” If the Supreme Court is compromised in some way — either bought off, pressured, threatened, or something more?”
I thought his answer was amazing.
The interview itself was excellent.
Please enjoy this interview for his response to that question as well as many other things, in case you missed it.
Enjoy:
And a back-up on Twitter ( which is now protected from Free Speech ):
Update from Loy Brunson EXCLUSIVE! # BrunsonBrothers pic. twitter.com/vwrtb64zlx
— Daily Noah.com ( @Daily NoahNews ) May 25, 2023
And on Rumble around:
And as promised, here are the links you need:
https ://loybrunson.com
https ://7discoveries.com
To join the letter writing campaign, please visit neither of the above-mentioned websites.
We need your assistance in bringing in 100 million letters to the Supreme Court.
We need to show them that the majority of this country supports them and wants this action taken.
Your action below is very significant and will be added to many others, only like voting!
100 million people who speak out loudly can change the world! One voice single is not strong, but 100 million of us can!
Please send your letter below!
Want more?
Please check out this article since we’ve covered Loy Brunson and his brothers for a while:
INCREDIBLE: Meet Loy Brunson, One Of The Incredible Brunson Brothers!
Have you heard a lot about the Supreme Court case involving the Brunson Brothers ( I also refer to them as the TRUMPet Brothers )? but are not well-versed in who they are?
Same around.
They kind of arrived from nowhere ( remember how Bo Polny keeps saying it will happen” suddenly” and within a 24-hour period and how no one will notice the plan coming )? They surely do, but they do! ).
However, the interesting thing is that they already had some sibling fame as Lute players before engaging in any of this work with the Supreme Court.
I’ve previously posted a little bit about how their trumpet players play, but I want to introduce you to Loy Brunson, the brother who appears to be the Legal Eagle ( not to diminish the other four ).
But OH MY is he remarkable!
ALL of our elected officials should sound like THIS!
Can you picture a Congress with 535 people like this guy?
Our country would change immediately!
We would be the envy of all peoples, the shining city on a hill!
Yet we can a fat buffoon who ca n’t even wear pants (you all know who I mean ), pencil neck (you know him ), bat-crazy Nancy, and Chuckie Schumer. Only to name a few.
But you must check out this man.
This video might be one of the best you’ve ever seen.
Listen as he explains how the Constitution actually solves EVERY problem we have …
like taxes.
Many of you are aware of this, but the IRS did n’t exist until 1862!
Our country served perfectly also — and thrived — for over 100 years without taxes!
Why were n’t they available?
Because it turns out they are Illegal!
Brunson explains.
It’s all proper according to the Constitution!
He addresses a lot of other subjects, but his most notable one was his investigation of what he refers to as the” Interpretation Clause” in the 9th Amendment.
He says he was the first to discover it, and I think he’s right because I searched for” Interpretation Clause Constitution” and nothing comes up in search results.
However, it it is as it is right now. ignored for many years!
We’re not a great country and the Founding Fathers were no great people…. …… You’ll be blown away as you watch Loy Brunson explain more as you listen to me explain that they were divinely inspired to write that document.
Watch and enjoy appropriate here:
Rumble’s backup
Pass it round and let’s start awakening some people!
And now if you want more on the Supreme Court case, keep reading …
Supreme Court of Thailand Case Moving Forward! TGP confirmed!
Many weeks ago, I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams, the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal.
In fact, I was so young that some people were skeptical that it was true.
Our articles are PERMANENTLY true.
If I ca n’t vet the article, I do n’t run it.
The Supreme Court website was the only source that was independently verified, and this was totally independent!
That’s kind of what being a journalist means.
You take in all the information and often you break the story!
That’s what we did right this second.
I read one comment in my article that said,” I do n’t believe it’s real, I have n’t seen it covered by the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit!”
Well…. The Epoch Times covered it immediately after the commenter, and The Gateway Pundit covered it today… once more.
I’m still waiting for my apology from the commenter ( I forget who it was, they are not memorable ) but I wo n’t stay up all night waiting.
In all seriousness, the story is Extremely interesting and Quite true!
Below is Tim Canova from my friends at The Gateway Pundit:
While there has been much public attention on the U. S. Supreme Court’s provide consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. A little-known case that just appeared on the Court docket could, in contrast, accomplish just that. Four brothers from Utah, who are regular Americans, filed a pro se lawsuit against Brunson v. Adams, demanding the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, as well as 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators, without first conducting an investigation into serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of for relief would probably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.
The Brunsons were able to avoid an appeal that was halted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and submit the case to the Supreme Court, which has then scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. Only four Justices ‘ votes would be required to proceed with the Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.
It seems surprising that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. However, these are no typical times. Democrats may also push for legislation to impose term limits and a minimum retirement age for Justices during this month’s weak duck session of Congress, opening the door to the packing of the Court. Such a course would seem to be apparent violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices” shall hold their Offices during good Behavior”. Since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, some Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their individual security in addition to these administrative threats to the Supreme Court.
Maybe these administrative and security threats have given the Court strong motivators to list Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a deterrent to any attempts by the lame duck Congress to violate the Court’s independence. Or maybe conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber- stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of severe allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.
Additionally, new weeks have seen a cascade of news that raises the possibility of a potential legal crisis that might be challenging to resolve without the Court’s assistance. In the weeks leading up to the 2020 election, it is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) was working with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor Hunter Biden’s laptop. This was a flagrant First Amendment violation intended to rig the outcome and install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. However, the January 6th committee may immediately send a fugitive referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, it was reported that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA ) of the Department of Homeland Security was working with Big Tech to censor election critics.
Supreme Court Justices may also see these looming storm clouds and come to the conclusion that the Court’s intervention is required to stop further civil unrest brought on by constitutional violations that are putting a strain on public trust and confidence in the results of the elections of 2020 and 2022. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have unfortunately become political and complicit. The only way to rig an election when they violate the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, can be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.
More than a hundred of its individual members notified all of Congress due to its January 6th vote, according to the Brunson lawsuit, detailing major allegations of election fraud and calling for the establishment of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.
Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence ( ODNI ) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by the executive branch and the legislature itself. When ODNI submitted its report on December 18th, Congress should have begun posing questions and conducting inquiries. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U. S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of unusual election interference but were split as to its significance and whether for breach of national security was enough to overturn the outcome of the election. Nevertheless, Congress did not take any action or launch an investigation. Rather, Congress gave the DNI and the Intelligence Community the opportunity to question the results of the potentially fraudulent election results on January 6th.
When the results of the 1876 national election were in doubt, Congress created a unique Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. Contrary to what Congress had in early 2021 before the National Inauguration’s date of January 20th. The long-awaited ODNI report, which showed a disconnect between the intelligence community and the DNI’s individual conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered with the outcome of the presidential election, would have been delivered to Congress yet one more day before the election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community badly delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This illustrates a pattern of collusion and conspiracy between congressional staffers and American intelligence agencies to conceal evidence of unusual election interference, which constitutes the High Treason crime.
The Brunson lawsuit does not dispute that the election was stolen; rather, it states that a significant portion of Congress violated their Oaths to defend and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both domestically and internationally, by failing to do so through Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.”}]] [[{“value”:”
Remember Loy Brunson & the Brunson Brothers
You do.
Incredible family, incredible people.
Loy, who is not an attorney, is best known for the incredible cases he has brought before the U.S. Supreme Court in regards to the 2020 election.
Just someone who actually sat and read the Constitution. Imagine that!
The Brunson Brothers’ cases brought before the Supreme Court were initially greeted with great anticipation, but they were then met with disappointment when they were either dismissed, sent back or ignored.
Are they dead?
I know you all want an update. (Me too!) I haven’t shared much with you up until now.
I found a brand-new interview that Loy Brunson conducted just a few weeks ago, on May 25, 2024. It is filled with hope and optimism.
Loy claims that the case is not dead.
He says the Supreme Court could take it up at any time. It’s entirely up to them. They could do it today or tomorrow, a week from now etc. Nothing prevents them from taking it up again.
When is the best time to use ….?
Oh, that would be a fantastic ending to this movie!
Watch this interview first.
LOY BRUNSON SAYS 2020 ELECTION CAMPAIGN IS NOT OVER: SUPREME CREEK CASE COULD CHANGE IT ALL! pic.twitter.com/g4oGjaL6Eo
— DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 6, 2024
Loy’s last update was in May 2023, and it comes from an interview I had with him.
It was a great pleasure to talk to him. He was so informative!
Below you will find links to all the relevant information, including the letter-writing campaign.
Supreme Court compromised? Why Loy Brunson still believes we can win!
Loy Brunson was a guest on my show the other day and I had the honor of speaking to him.
What a classy act and brilliant mind.
It was a pleasure to talk with him and ask a lot of questions about the Supreme Court case he is currently pursuing.
One of the questions I asked him was “How can we expect the Supreme Court to rule in our favor if they are compromised in some other way — whether bought off, threatened, blackmailed or something else?”
I thought that his answer was brilliant.
The entire interview was a mess.
If you missed this interview, you can find out his answer to the question and much more.
Enjoy:
Here’s a backup on Twitter (which has now been cleared for Free Speech).
Exclusive: Update from Loy Brunson #BrunsonBrothers pic.twitter.com/vwrtb64zlx
DailyNoah.com @DailyNoahNews May 25, 2023
Here is Rumble:
Here are the links that you need.
https://loybrunson.com
https://7discoveries.com
Please visit any of the websites listed below to join the Letter Writing Campaign!
We need your help to send 100 million letters to the Supreme Court!
We must show them that a majority of the country wants to take action.
Your vote will be added to the many others.
100 million voices can change the world.
Please send us your letter!
Want more?
Please check out this article:
Meet Loy Brunson – One of the Incredible Brunson brothers!
You may have heard about the Brunson Brothers’ (I call them the TRUMPet brothers) Supreme Court case …. but don’t really know who they are.
Same here.
They appeared out of nowhere (remember when Bo Polny kept telling us that it would happen “suddenly”, in a 24-hour period, and how no one would see the plan coming up? They certainly fit the bill. ).
The funny thing is that they were already somewhat famous as TRUMPet Players before doing any work with the Supreme Court.
I’ve already posted a bit about their trumpeting, but I now want to introduce Loy Brunson. He seems to be the Legal Eagle. (Not to take anything from the other four).
But OH MY, is he incredible?
This is how all of our elected representatives should sound!
Imagine a Congress with 535 people who look like this guy.
Our country would be transformed overnight!
We would be the shining, hilltop city… the envy of all nations.
We can find a fat buffoon (you all know the one I’m talking about), a pencil neck (you already know him), nutty Nancy, and Chuckie. Just to name a couple.
You have to see this guy…
This is one of the best videos that you will ever watch.
Listen to him explain how the Constitution literally fixes EVERY problem that we face…
Like taxes.
You may not know, but the IRS was not created until 1862.
Over 100 years of tax-free service to our country!
Why didn’t they exist?
They are unconstitutional, as it turns out!
Brunson explains.
The Constitution says it all!
He covers many other topics, but his discovery of the “Interpretation Clause”, as he calls it, in the 9th Amendment was my favorite.
He claims to be the first person to discover it. I believe him because I searched “Interpretation Clause Constitution”, but nothing came up in the search results.
It is there, plain as day ….ignored over decades and centuries!
Loy Brunson explains that we’re not a perfectly perfect country, and neither were the Founding Fathers. ….BUT ….I believe they were inspired by God to create this document.
Enjoy and watch this video:
Back on Rumble
Pass it around to start waking up some people!
Continue reading if you’d like to know more about the Supreme Court case.
TRUMPet Supreme Court Case is Moving Forward! TGP Confirmed
I was one of only a few websites that told you about Brunson V. Adams, a Supreme Court Case which could change the outcome of the 2020 elections.
I was so early in the game that many people questioned whether it was real.
All of our articles are 100% real.
If I cannot vet the article, it will not be published.
This was verified by the best possible source: the Supreme Court Website!
This is what it means to work as a journalist ….
You can sometimes break the story by taking in all the information!
This is what we did.
One comment to my article read: I don’t believe it’s true, I haven’t seen the Epoch Times cover it!
The Epoch Times covered the story shortly after, and The Gateway Pundit did so again today …..
I’m still waiting on my apology from the commenter, but I won’t wait all night.
The story is very real and exciting!
Here is Tim Canova, from my friends at The Gateway Pundit:
Although the U.S. Supreme Court has received a lot of attention for its current consideration of the “independent-state-legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina redistricting issues, this case would not affect the 2020 Presidential Election immediately. A little-known case, which appeared on the Court docket recently, could have the same effect. Brunson v. Adams was not reported by the mainstream media. Four brothers from Utah filed the case pro se, seeking to remove President Biden and Vice-President Harris, as well as 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states, foreign election interference and breach of national security during the 2020 Presidential Election. Senators who voted on January 6, 2020 to certify the Electors of the Electoral College without first investigating serious allegations regarding election fraud in a half dozen states, foreign election interference, and breach of national safety in the Presidential Election of 2020. This would likely result in Donald Trump being restored to the presidency.
The Brunsons were able to bypass an appeal which was frozen by the U.S. Court of Appeals 10th Circuit in order to get the case before the Supreme Court, which has scheduled a hearing on January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition of a Writ of certiorari only requires the votes of four Justices in order to move the case ahead.
It is astonishing that the Court would enter such waters exactly two years after the Congressional vote to elect Joe Biden President. These are not normal times. Democrats may push legislation during this month’s lame-duck session of Congress that would impose term limits on Justices and a mandatory retirement, opening the door to packing. This would be a clear violation of Article III Section 1 of the Constitution, which states that Justices are to “hold their Offices while in good behavior.”
These institutional and security threats may have been powerful incentives for the Court, which has placed Brunson v. Adams in its dockets to deter any attempts by the lame duck Congress that would attempt to undermine the Court’s independence. Or maybe conservatives on the Court intend to use the Brunson case like a sword in order to remove public officials they believe violated their constitutional oaths by rubber-stamping the Electors’ votes on Jan. 6, without first investigating serious allegations of electoral fraud and foreign interference.
In recent weeks, a cascade news reports have suggested that a constitutional crisis is imminent and could be difficult to resolve if the Court does not intervene. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has now admitted that it colluded with Twitter and Facebook in the weeks before the 2020 elections to censor the news of Hunter Biden’s laptop. This was a egregious First Amendment breach intended to rig election results and possibly install an unaccountable criminal puppet government. The January 6th Committee may be sending a criminal referral to Justice Department for President Trump’s arrest, despite the fact that his reinstated tweets remind us that he did not call for insurrection on January 6, but peaceful protest. The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, was reported to be working with Big Tech in recent months to censor election critics.
Supreme Court Justices could see these approaching storm clouds, and decide that the Court must intervene to prevent civil unrest due to constitutional violations that undermine public confidence and trust in the results of the 2020 and 2022 election. We are dependent on law enforcement agencies to prosecute criminals who violate state and federal laws in order to rig elections. Unfortunately, these agencies have become politicized and complicit. When criminals violate the Constitution, the supreme law in the country, to rig an elections, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit.
The Brunson lawsuit claims that, prior to the 6th of January vote, more than 100 of Congress’ own members had put the entire Congress on notice by presenting serious allegations of electoral frauds and calling for the creation of an Electoral Commission to investigate these allegations.
Moreover, by December 18, 2020, the Office of Director of National Intelligence was required to present a report on the foreign threats to the Presidential election of 2020. This deadline was set both by Congress and by executive order. Congress should have asked questions and started an investigation when the 18th of December passed without ODNI submitting a report. DNI John Ratcliffe, who was overseeing 17 U.S. Intelligence agencies at the time, announced that they had found evidence of foreign interference in the election. However, the agencies were divided on its significance and if it was enough to overturn the results of the election. Congress took no action, conducted no inquiry or investigation. Instead, Congress approved possible fraudulent election results on the 6th of January without asking any questions to the DNI or Intelligence Community.
When the results of 1876’s presidential election were disputed, Congress created a special Electoral Commission consisting of five House members and five Senators as well as five Supreme Court Justices. This commission was to investigate. In early 2021, Congress had almost two weeks to investigate the matter before the date of the presidential inauguration on January 20th. Congress could have waited just one day more to receive the long-awaited ODNI Report, which reflected a split within the Intelligence Community as well as the DNI’s conclusion that the People’s Republic of China interfered in the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf concluded at the time, because of their political differences with the Trump administration, the Intelligence Community delayed their findings until the January 6th Electoral College Certification by Congress. This shows a pattern of collusion between members of Congress and U.S. Intelligence agencies to cover up evidence of foreign interference in the election.
The Brunson lawsuit doesn’t claim that the election was stolen. It only claims that a majority of Congress, in failing to investigate serious allegations of election rigging, and breaches of national safety, violated the Oaths they took to protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies – foreign and domestic. This Oath was also taken by Supreme Court justices and members of the U.S. Military.
“}]]
